Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

topic posted Sat, September 10, 2005 - 8:08 PM by  Sídhe
Share/Save/Bookmark
So I've been thinking a bit about Kia (the idea of individuated chaos acting as the foundation of "free will"/"consciousness" not the Korean car company). I've always preferred it as a core principle of chaos magick theory over the idea of baphomet...if for no other reason than the fact that baphomet has too much, how shall I say...baggage.

I understand why Carroll thought Baphomet would make a good egregore of chaos magick but frankly I don't see why any single egregore gets to hold that title...regardless of how much you stretch the concept of an egregore it's still fundamentally a byproduct of this or that paradigm.

Kia lends itself more to the idea of a metaparadigm as it has no fixed paradigmal reference nor does it have any set anthropomorphic or theriopomorphic characteristics. Nor can it really even qualify as an egregore as it's an individuated critter and not the product of a group's worship or idea of godhead.

I also thought that if "experiences" consist of the masks or shells left behind by an ever moving/active Kia then big "R" reality amounts to the surface tension between Kia and Chaos (the pre-existing/sub-existing potentiality of stuff and things) whacking up against each other in a timeless dance.

Frankly, Baphomet needs to be knifed in the back and dumped in a pile with the rest of humanity's egregores. But that's just my take on it, egregores have their use and place, but ultimately their own set of limits...none of them really can bear the stretch marks which come with trying to spread themselves out.
posted by:
Sídhe
Milwaukee
  • Re: Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

    Thu, September 15, 2005 - 11:20 AM
    I thought that -- at least according to Carroll -- Kia itself can never be evoked/invoked. o.O Maybe I'm wrong. Food for thought, thought for controversy. ;-)

    Philosophically speaking -- and I hate speaking philosophically -- I've found the concept of Kia most akin to the Mystery. Like when I take shrooms and try to figure out "the point" of it all, and suddenly that point slithers away and becomes something else entirely.

    It's very tricky.
    • Re: Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

      Fri, September 16, 2005 - 4:49 AM
      Kia can be invoked but it can never be conceptualised beyond anything but a pregnant void...to paraphrase Pete.

      There's an invokation of Kia (in enochian) as part of the Mass of Chaos Choronzon (C)....one of my favorite rites from the old days...

      Meka
  • Re: Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

    Fri, September 16, 2005 - 10:41 AM
    Josh, could you elaborate a bit on the tension between Kia and Chaos?

    Slava
    • Re: Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

      Sat, September 17, 2005 - 9:01 AM
      "Josh, could you elaborate a bit on the tension between Kia and Chaos?"

      Sure, the way I look at it is something along the following lines: (I say "along the following lines" because my own thoughts on the matter are still kind of up in the air) - chaos, as understood in terms of chaos magick means much more than the common newsman's understanding of it - i.e. destructive action and/or confusion. But you all already knew that. Indeed, it's beyond most currently understood definitions of the term and that's how it should be. Any given moment of awareness is surrounded by, preceded by, followed by and underlied by a state of total potentiality. That, for lack of a better word, would be termed "chaos". Though what normally arises is what is expected, that which is unexpected may also arise. In fact, it's the unexpected which makes life worth it really...no matter how unwelcome it can sometimes be.

      Kia, the differentiated individual conceptualization of chaos on the level of each and everyone's consciousness exists in a state of perpetual motion. The tension that I spoke of naturally arises, a friction that gives form (or the illusion of form) to what is subsequently perceived and classified as "real". I'm not really certain the mechanics which give rise to the tension in question, I usually focus on the practical - thus, my concern lies in the byproduct of the tension, not in it's origin.

      Ultimately it can be posited that there is no difference between chaos and kia, - i.e. all that seperates us, even on the level of fundamental particles or preternatural chaos is illusion. facets of a diamond deluded into thinking we each are a seperate thing. <shrug>

      However, that illusion is necessary in order to keep things in a constant state of flux, the "play of kia" - the endless variation arising from billions of individual consciousnesses meeting in unnumbered combinations (and "forms" of interaction).

      As a side note, while Carroll states that one can't really invoke/evoke Kia (or chaos for that matter) as anything more than a pregnant void there is a suggested methodology right in his own book for doing just that - it can be found in the instructions for creating a chaosphere. To get at something which lies beyond definition one takes a route of paradox and extreme contradictions. - i.e. one sets up a state of extreme mental attenuation...which creates tension.

      In the case of Kia...it's a matter of rapidly diving into radically different and paradoxal states of consciousness and experience.
      • Re: Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

        Mon, September 19, 2005 - 11:01 AM
        Interesting...I think however this discussion of Kia/Chaos conjures up the "xian" god the father and jesus the son, dualism. they're both omnipotent and one and the same, but different....in fact, something about the popular view of chaos bugs me, really...if it is sooooo undefinable, it amounts to the same thing as absolute determinism---both absolute chaos and absolute order are ultimately unknowable and uncontrollable by man. so the reality must be a higher order that fluctuates, neither order nor chaos, but is simultaneously both!---aha!---so the individual would really be a fractal of the whole, containing a pattern of the whole which can alter itself one way or another.

        in my view, chaos magick should not be monotheism with "god" exchanged for "chaos"
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

          Thu, September 29, 2005 - 6:39 PM
          >>chaos magick should not be monotheism with "god" exchanged for "chaos"<<

          Why not? "Everything is permitted."

          But: why make that particular comparison in the first place? Other comparisons exist, and they seem more accurate. Chaos to tao as kia to chi...


          >>if it is sooooo undefinable, it amounts to the same thing as absolute determinism---both absolute chaos and absolute order are ultimately unknowable and uncontrollable by man.<<

          Many sciency sort of people anticipate that the grand unified theory, while ostensibly an accurate descriptor of reality, will prove unsolvable except in special cases. Cf non-linear differential equations...
          "Nothing is True."


          T.
          • Re: Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

            Sat, October 1, 2005 - 7:00 PM
            "But: why make that particular comparison in the first place? Other comparisons exist, and they seem more accurate. Chaos to tao as kia to chi... "

            LOL! I had finally gotten around to responding to that followup post only to find that my response had been posted for me, so to speak :^)

            My thanks to "Dark Symbiot" for saying precisely what I intended to say...but probably better.
      • Re: Kia (or, A little deicide with your tea)

        Mon, September 26, 2005 - 3:45 PM
        Here's a message I had written a short while ago on the subject:


        "What I gathered is that you see Chaos as total potentiality, whereas Kia is the manifestation of Chaos/potentiality in humans in the form of consciousness and free will.

        As far as I understand, that means that Kia is a blank (albeit "living" or "active" or "pregnant") slate out of which may (potentially) rise any combination of elements/internal-factors that constitute and define a unique mind/will. This mind/will that shall react in a unique way to externally-determined influences.

        I am, however, still not certain I understand what you mean by tension between Kia and Chaos. Do you mean, perhaps, that as the individual develops and experiences add up in the mind (potentiality becomes actuality), the individual "solidifies" and becomes less in synch with original Chaos?

        If that is your reasoning, I still don't see it as tension between Kia and Chaos. Instead, I see it as Kia's influence being overshadowed/overwhelmed by the life experiences a person gains. In other words, whereas the initial stages of a person's identity/character were birthed by Kia, the domino effect of events/experiences in life end up having a larger hand in molding a person's identity/character. People get caught up in the external factors that determine the course of one's life. Of course these external factors are ultimately caused by Chaos, but they overshadow our personal Kia. But some of us desire to more freedom in affecting our own lives and our surroundings. We want to influence the domino effect instead of being helplessly caught up in it. This is where magick comes in. In order to create change by means of working with Chaos, one has to enter a state of mind that steps back from the domino effect of life and become consciously aware (through meditation, ritual, gnosis, etc.) of that original part of yourself that is Kia. Because Kia is a form of Chaos.

        What are your thoughts?"

        ~Slava

Recent topics in "ChaosMagick"